CINCINNATI — A federal appeals court in Cincinnati has ruled that “raising” a middle finger at a police officer is protected as free speech.
In a ruling filed this week, the U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals said: “Any reasonable officer would know that a citizen who raises her middle finger engages in speech protected by the First Amendment.”
The case stems from a 2017 traffic stop in suburban Detroit.
Taylor police Officer Matthew Minard pulled over Debra Cruise-Gulyas for speeding. Minard apparently decided to show leniency and wrote a ticket for a lesser violation.
The 6th Circuit’s opinion describes what happened next like this: As Cruise-Gulyas drove away, she “repaid Minard’s kindness by raising her middle finger at him.”
Minard then pulled her over a second time, less than 100 yards from where the initial stop happened, according to the opinion. He changed the ticket to a speeding violation.
Cruise-Gulyas then sued the officer.
A three-judge panel of the 6th Circuit said her gesture did not violate any identified law. Minard, it said, “clearly lacked authority to stop Cruise-Gulyas a second time.”
“Minard should have known better,” the opinion says.
It pointed to a 2013 ruling by another appeals court that said the “ancient gesture of insult” does not give police “a reasonable suspicion of a traffic violation or impending criminal activity.”
Minard’s attorneys had sought to have Cruise-Gulyas’ lawsuit thrown out, saying “qualified immunity” protected him from liability. The 6th Circuit said that protection doesn’t apply if an officer violates a person’s constitutional rights.
Cruise-Gulyas’ attorney, Hammad Khan, said he was pleased with both federal court rulings in the case. He declined further comment because the lawsuit remains pending.
Follow Kevin Grasha on Twitter: @kgrasha
Read or Share this story: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2019/03/14/court-rules-raising-middle-finger-police-free-speech/3166243002/