No Result
View All Result
Fashion,News And Health Blogging Updates
  • Home
  • Fashion
  • Lifestyle
  • Parenting
    • Family
  • Health
  • Food
  • Baby & Toddler
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • Fashion
  • Lifestyle
  • Parenting
    • Family
  • Health
  • Food
  • Baby & Toddler
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Fashion,News And Health Blogging Updates
No Result
View All Result
ADVERTISEMENT
Home 20th Century Fox TV

Parliament had failed on Brexit long before this prorogation | Vernon Bogdanor | Opinion

newsfashion by newsfashion
August 29, 2019
in 20th Century Fox TV
0
Parliament had failed on Brexit long before this prorogation | Vernon Bogdanor | Opinion
0
SHARES
4
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT


ADVERTISEMENT

“A constitutional outrage”, declared the Speaker, John Bercow; “a very British coup”, said the shadow chancellor, John McDonnell. Not to be outdone, Nicola Sturgeon added “the day any semblance of British democracy died”. Some have compared the situation to 1628, when Charles I prorogued parliament before dispensing with its services entirely. But Charles I was not, unless the history books are grievously mistaken, faced with the problem of implementing the outcome of a referendum.

It is time perhaps to tone down the rhetoric and consider the facts. The five-week prorogation appears longer than it is because it includes the three weeks of the party conference season, when parliament does not normally sit. Parliament therefore loses two weeks. In 2014 there was a longer prorogation of 20 days, though that included the period of the European parliament elections and the Whitsun recess.

But of course the objection to prorogation has less to do with the time lost than its alleged purpose, frustrating the will of parliament. That the prime minister has unreasonably used his prerogative power to advise the Queen will, no doubt, form the basis of an approach to the courts. Whether that approach succeeds or not, the political dilemma remains: that parliament has willed the end of Brexit without willing the means.


MPs have rejected the government’s flagship policy without providing any alternative

In 2017, parliament empowered the prime minister to invoke article 50 by the massive majority of 384 votes when MPs passed the European Union (Notification of Withdrawal) Act. But in 2019, the Commons rejected the withdrawal agreement three times. The EU has responded that the agreement cannot be renegotiated. In logic, therefore, the only way to implement Brexit is without a deal. Since every member of the cabinet except for Priti Patel and Theresa Villiers voted at least once for the deal, they can hardly be blamed for the fact that a no-deal Brexit now seems the only logical alternative.

The Commons, it is often said, is opposed to a no-deal Brexit. But it is also opposed, as shown by its votes, to a second referendum (which it rejected by an absolute majority) and membership of the internal market and the customs union, and it has shown no disposition to revoke article 50. The only positive policy MPs have supported is that embodied in the Brady amendment, calling for the Irish backstop to be replaced with alternative arrangements, something the EU declares it will not countenance. MPs may claim that they are losing vital sitting days in September and October. But they have had three years to come up with an alternative policy. They have failed to do so.

Opponents of the government seek an extension of the Brexit date. But that is not in itself a policy. Two previous extensions have achieved nothing. Why should a third prove any different? Would MPs then accept the withdrawal agreement? Do they have the leverage to persuade the EU to alter its stance? Without an answer to these questions, a further extension is a mere empty aspiration. And were parliament to pass legislation preventing Britain leaving the EU without a deal, Brexit could be delayed for ever, since the Commons would then be free to reject every deal presented to it.

The truth is that 650 MPs cannot make policy. Only the government can do that. The role of parliament is not to govern but to scrutinise those who do. That is especially the case with the treaty-making power. Indeed, parliament has not rejected a treaty since 1864. And parliament is in no position to renegotiate a treaty. It has never in modern times sought to do so. The EU can negotiate only with governments, not with a motley alliance of MPs who are themselves divided between remainers and soft Brexiteers.

MPs have rejected the government’s flagship policy without providing any alternative. It is enabled to pursue this course because of the wretched Fixed-term Parliaments Act. Without that, Theresa May could have declared the deal a matter of confidence. That was what Edward Heath did in 1972 when he threatened a dissolution unless the European Communities bill was passed, securing in consequence a majority of eight on its second reading. Had May been able to do the same, the rebels would either have come to heel or there would have been a general election. But the threat of dissolution has now been removed from the prime minister’s armoury.

Once MPs have rejected the flagship policy of any government, their obvious recourse is to remove it and replace it with one more to their liking. That requires a successful no-confidence vote and either an alternative government chosen from the existing House of Commons or, more likely, a general election so that the people can arbitrate. But Boris Johnson’s opponents seem unsure that they could carry such a no-confidence vote. So there is an institutional deadlock that threatens to prevent Johnson from breaking the Brexit deadlock. That can now be broken only by the EU. In fact I suspect that the long prorogation is directed as much at the EU as Westminster, to convince the EU that parliament will not be able to stop a no-deal Brexit.

Looking at the sorry performance of the House of Commons elected in 2017, it is difficult to avoid remembering Winston Churchill’s condemnation of the parliaments of the 1930s as being “decided only to be undecided, resolved to be irresolute, adamant for drift, solid for fluidity, all-powerful to be impotent”. Parliament has shown itself not to be the solution to Brexit but the problem.

• Vernon Bogdanor is professor of government at King’s College London


ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Previous Post

Spurs draw Bayern, Chelsea to face Ajax – Champions League 2019-20! | Football

Next Post

Senior Tory rebels ready to back move against no-deal Brexit | Politics

newsfashion

newsfashion

Next Post
Senior Tory rebels ready to back move against no-deal Brexit | Politics

Senior Tory rebels ready to back move against no-deal Brexit | Politics

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recommended

11 Personality Traits of Successful Traders to Follow

11 Personality Traits of Successful Traders to Follow

4 days ago
5 Essential Home Office Organization Tips for 2021

5 Essential Home Office Organization Tips for 2021

2 weeks ago

Trending

How to watch the Marvel Netflix shows in order

How to watch the Marvel Netflix shows in order

2 years ago
Eyes Wide Shut Meaning, Analysis, Ending: Explained

Eyes Wide Shut Meaning, Analysis, Ending: Explained

2 years ago

Popular

Eyes Wide Shut Meaning, Analysis, Ending: Explained

Eyes Wide Shut Meaning, Analysis, Ending: Explained

2 years ago
Shows Like Manifest | 6 Must See Similar TV Series

Shows Like Manifest | 6 Must See Similar TV Series

2 years ago
How to watch the Marvel Netflix shows in order

How to watch the Marvel Netflix shows in order

2 years ago
Shows Like Elementary | 10 Must See Similar TV Series

Shows Like Elementary | 10 Must See Similar TV Series

2 years ago
Ben To Season 2: Release Date

Ben To Season 2: Release Date

2 years ago
ADVERTISEMENT
Fashion,News And Health Blogging Updates

News Fashion Blog brings news,fashion,media ,social updates.Stay tuned!

Email us at

expertblogwriter786@gmail.com for publishing your posts.

Recent Posts

  • 11 Personality Traits of Successful Traders to Follow
  • 5 Essential Home Office Organization Tips for 2021
  • Beach Swimming Pools in Sydney
  • Obeying Traffic Rules Prevents Accidents
  • Dry Fruits For Your Health

Follow Us

  • About
  • Shop
  • Forum
  • Contact

Copyright © 2020, News Fashion Blog

No Result
View All Result

Copyright © 2020, News Fashion Blog

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Fill the forms bellow to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
Download youtube videosIelts TrendsIELTS BANDSFashion BlogOnline NewsCasino NewsSocial Blogging News